Since their discovery, various theories have been proposed regarding the methods and motivations underlying the lines' construction. The archaeological explanation as to
who made them and how is widely accepted; namely that the Nazca people made the lines using simple tools and surveying equipment. Wooden stakes in the ground at the end of some lines (which were used to carbon-date the figures) and ceramics found on the surface support this theory. Furthermore, researchers such as
Joe Nickell of the
University of Kentucky, have reproduced the figures using the technology available to the Nazca Indians of the time without aerial supervision. With careful planning and simple technologies, a small team of individuals could recreate even the largest figures within a couple of days.
Two Methods were used to create
geoglyphs in the coastal plains of Peru and Chile.
The typical method, the lines were
made by removing pebbles which cover the surface of
the Nazca desert. When the gravel (desert pavement)
is removed, they contrast with the light-colored
earth underneath.
The other
approach is to pile stones or
gravel to form the symbol or
line. There are also
geoglyphs that employ a
combination of the two.
There are several thousand simple
lines and geometric patterns on the Nazca plateau
and surrounding regions, as well as over seventy
curvilinear animal, insect, and human figures in the
Nazca area alone, with more in other areas. The area
encompassing the Nazca lines is nearly 500 square
kilometers (200 square miles), and the largest
figures can be nearly 900 feet (270 meters) long.
The geoglyphs persist due to the extremely dry,
windless, and constant climate of the Nazca and
coastal Peruvian regions: the Nazca desert is one of
the driest on Earth and maintains a temperature
around 25°C (77°F) year round, and the lack of wind
has helped keep the lines uncovered to the present
day. Other geoglyph areas, such as the Atacama
desert of Chile are even drier!
What the desert pavement looks like
before being removed to show the soil underneath.
Note the
precision of the construction of the
spider compared to the long line running
through it - both were created by
removal of the desert pavement - by
digging a very shallow trench or trough
Removal Of Desert Pavement
A typical line was created by removing
the desert pavement exposing the soil underneath
A close-up
of an original Nazca symbol (a
hummingbird)
In
1984, a team from University of
Leicester, UK, lead by Clive Ruggles
attempted to prove that the major
Nazca geoglyphs could easily have
been constructed by relatively small
teams of people in short amounts of
time.
They chose to construct a simple
spiral design similar to the spiral
that is the eye of the
Nazca Whale.
In
short order the team had a fully
formed geoglyph! This
dispelled the nonsense notions of
those that believed that only with
the help of aliens, or aircraft,
could the lines have been built.
The reality is much simpler:
ordinary humans build the Nazca
lines, with creativity!
A
team from National Geographic, lead
by Joe Nickell, recreates tha Nazca
Spider (from the Ancient Astronauts
TV program)
click here for more
information
University of Leicester team laying
out the line for the spiral symbol
using tools and techniques available
to the Nazca culture
University of Leicester team
clearing away the desert pavement,
exposing the light soil/sand
underneath
A complete spiral quickly created by
Clive Ruggles group from the
University of University of
Leicester 1984 - without the benefit
of overhead observation or guidance
Even though we know exactly how the
lines were made, there is less existing evidence concerning
why the figures were built, so the
Nazca people's motivation remains the lines' most persistent mystery. Many scholars believe that their motivation was religious, making images that only gods in the sky could see clearly.
Kosok and
Reiche advanced one of the earliest reasons given for the Nazca Lines: that they were intended to point to the places on the distant horizon where the Sun and other celestial bodies rose or set. This hypothesis was evaluated by two different experts in archaeoastronomy, Gerald Hawkins and Anthony Aveni, and they both concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support an astronomical explanation
for the entirety of the massive
geoglyphic complex.
However, having said the above, in August 2007
new science was presented by Anthony L. Peratt, Fellow,
IEEE, John McGovern, Alfred H. Qφyawayma, Life Member,
IEEE, Marinus Anthony Van der Sluijs, and Mathias G.
Peratt, Member, IEEE. This new study and theory
explores the relationship between petroglyphs,
geoglyphs, and periodic extreme intensity aurora
discharges and displays. The world over, on a
frequent basis (every few thousand years) there are
extreme high energy aurora that change the coloration,
patterns, and low latitude visibility of aurora.
In many cases the aurora may product high energy static
discharges on to the ground - resulting in the formation
of "lightning glass" in shapes and patterns
significantly different from regular lightning strikes -
in lines and bands.
A major problem with these artifacts
is our ability to correctly and precisely date the lines
and symbols. We have mostly relied upon easily
datable objects (wood and ceramics) to provide reliable
dates for the lines. However, these may not be as
reliable, as some would like to believe. Most
estimates place the lines creation within a span of 200 years, yet
this could actually be a window of 1,000 years or much more.
Thus they may very well not be an artifact (the major
lines) of the Nazca culture, and that the Nazcans may be
responsible for only adding their own mimicked lines and
symbols to those original put down previously.
Because of the dry climate of the region, it is possible
the lines (or some of them) are substantially older than
current prevailing theory.
In
1985, the archaeologist Johan Reinhard published archaeological, ethnographic, and historical data demonstrating that worship of mountains and other water sources played a dominant role in Nazca religion and economy from ancient to recent times. He presented the
hypothesis that the lines and figures can be explained as part of religious practices involving the worship of deities associated with the availability of water and thus the fertility of crops.
In his hypothesis that the lines were interpreted as being primarily used as sacred paths leading to places where these deities could be worshiped and the figures as symbolically representing animals and objects meant to invoke their aid. However, the precise meanings of many of the individual geoglyphs remain unsolved.
Another, less scientific hypothesis involves the work of
David Johnson. Johnson has researched the Nazca Lines and their apparent
connection with underground waterways. Johnson allegedly used
dowsing to track these water tunnels, claiming that the lines indicate
whether the ground contains water or not. The areas with the most
geoglyphs are purportedly centered around areas with high amounts of
underground water and are usually close to wells and other on-land water
sources. A suggestion Johnson makes is the fact that the inhabitants living in
such a dry land would spend a significant portion of their time searching for
water sources. By creating a giant, full-scale map they would know exactly where
to find their water no matter what area of the
desert they were in. The geoglyphs would then be religious figures for the
gods or names given for each water source. That being said, this information
should be taken with a lot of care since Johnson used the very unscientific
method of dowsing to locate the purported watering holes.
Notwithstanding Gerald Hawkins' and Anthony Aveni's dismissal of an
astronomical explanation of the Nazca Lines and geoglyphs, eclipsologist Robin
Edgar has hypothesized that the Nazca Lines, particularly the biomorph &
zoomorph geoglyphs
that depict animals, human figures, birds and "flowers" that may be an
ancient response to the so-called "Eye of God" that is manifested in the sky
during a total solar eclipse.
An unusual series of total solar eclipses over southern Peru potentially coincided with
one estimated time period during which the Nazca Lines and geoglyphs were created. The totally
eclipsed sun distinctly resembles the pupil and iris of a gigantic eye looking
down from the sky thus providing an hypothesis as to why the
Nazca Indians created gigantic
geoglyph artworks that are best viewed by an "Eye in the Sky".
Another hypothesis contends that the lines are the remains of "walking temples,"
where a large group of worshipers walked along a preset pattern dedicated to a
particular holy entity, similar to the practice of
labyrinth walking. Residents of the local villages say the ancient
Indians conducted rituals on these giant drawings to thank the gods and to
ensure that water would continue to flow from the
Andes. This view correlates with the purposes of other North American
geoglyphs. However, the emergence of ritual after the fact, does not
prove that ritual was the reason or the basis for the creation of the geoglyphs
to begin with. To the contrary, it is common for practices to de-evolve
over time from fact to mythology.
Also, according to another
fanciful recent hypothesis from Michael Vaillant, conductors
under the form of very slim gold or copper leafs would have been stretched on
the ground. These conductors would have been used as antennas to collect the
very low frequencies magnetotelluric waves produced in certain seismographic areas, and that
occurred a few hours (or days) before the seisms. This hypothesis relies on a
controversial theory named as "SES" (Seismic Electric Signals).
However, there has never been any remnants of these antennae found.
Perhaps the most controversial
hypothesis was put forward by
Erich von Dδniken in his book Chariots of the Gods, who proposed that the lines were in fact landing strips for alien spacecraft. His argument is similar to Woodmann's, claiming that the designs are so large and complex that they could only have been constructed using
or for flying machines.
However, the major missing point in
most hypothesis is simply that almost all religious or
mythical structures also serve functional roles.
From Stonehenge to Notre dam, these structures fulfill a
mythical aspect, coupled with a physical use or
manifestation. Thus when you look at the scope of
this creation, covering hundreds (thousands) of square
miles, it becomes obvious that there was a practical use
for the geoglyphs, or they would have been far more
limited. However, one of the practical uses could
simply have been documentation of an event as suggested
in a August 2007 theory relating the Aurora!
The single most disturbing aspects of
the Nazca lines - and I mean lines, not the zoomorphic
symbols, is both the precision and quantity.
Though they tend to fall into two distinct classes
(one: precise; two: imprecise). Regardless, this
was a massive undertaking, to which what purpose
justified the considerable labor required? It is
this "purpose" that is the central mystery of the
Nazca Plateau! As well as the lines of
Palpa,
Casma, and elsewhere!
One of the first thing that an
observer sees when looking at both the Nazca (Nasca)
and Palpa Lines & Symbols is that there are two
distinct classes of artifacts: one class (Class One
Geoglyph per McGuinness) is the
ultra precise lines & designs - near perfect geometries,
including symbols such as the Nazca Spiral, and
lines and trapezoids found across the plateau; the
second (Class Two Geoglyph per McGuinness) are the obviously not so perfect shapes and
symbols that appear to be created without the
benefit of the technology and skill used to create the former.
Both of these classes of objects use similar
techniques of removing the desert paving to expose
lighter soil beneath.
This is not an uncommon occurrence
in ancient sites for there to be multiple
architectural or design styles occur over the span
of significant time. Frequently you will see
cultures evolve their science and technology,
building upon the structures of the past. You
will also see cultures in decline, or new emergent
cultures attempting to recreate the much more
precise structures of their ancestors, without the
skill or precision used previously.
While precise dating makes this
difficult to establish with absolute certainty, in
the author's opinion, it appears clearly, from the
visual evidence, that not one culture produced the
Nazca lines, but rather two. One mimicking the
other, and producing lines and symbols of noticeably
less precision and quality.
This is also significant for
another reason. Namely that the original
purpose of the more precise lines and symbols, may
have been altogether different than that of the
copies. While we speculate on the ceremonial
nature of the line's use, it is important to
remember that there may have been two different
purposes, depending on which class of objects we are
looking at!
On the pages of this website, we attempt to correlate
geoglyph artifacts by apparent cultural context and
appearance. This system will help in understanding the
geoglyph line and symbol images.
Class One: The object conforms with the cultural context of
the immediate area and represents the highest degree of precision
in construction resulting in straight lines and evenly
spaced and proportional symbol elements
Class Two: The object conforms with the cultural context of
the immediate area and does not represent the highest degree of
precision in construction, resulting in more imprecise spacing or
alignments
Class Three: The object does not conform to the cultural
context of the immediate area and may represent a modern
intrusion into the context
Class Four: The object does not appear to conform to the
cultural context of the immediate area but appears to be
consistent with regional cultures representing an isolated
or limited intrusion
Class Five: The object appears to be anomalous in both
context and characteristics, a significant deviation from
the essential characteristics of other contextual objects,
but does not appear to be a modern intrusion
The object appears substantially damaged, destroyed, or modified
The object appears substantially intact and viewable
The object was predominantly constructed by removal of desert
pavement or surface layer exposing the soil beneath
The object was predominantly constructed by collection and
placement of stones forming the line, geometric, or symbol
pattern
The complete object is clearly viewable from ground level or
from below
The complete object is not clearly viewable from ground level
or from below, and must be viewed from above to be seen in
its entirety
While some speak of the mythical
or metaphysical nature of the lines and their
relationship to "lay lines", magnetic flux, or
mysterious water courses (which seem the least
likely since they clearly understood water
management), their may be another explanation: the
evolving process to work out celestial mechanics and
a predictable calendar.
In Casma, in Amcash Department of
Peru, the Fortress of
Chankillo has established, without a doubt, that
the ancient Peruvians (like the more modern Maya)
had an understanding of the sun, seasons, and the
sky. But where are the botched attempts to
perfect this process? If our Nazca architects
were attempting to map the positions of the sun and
stars on specific cycles, without understanding such
things yet as the movement of the earth, it is
logical that they would have placed their markers
incorrectly. Unfortunately, in the Nazca
plain, every modification of the desert is permanent
- without an undo command. We will never know
how many times the planner of Stonehenge tweaked
their stones to get the just right. Bur this
more than anything may account for the quantity of
lines and their overlapping nature, and multiple
vantage points. So in essence, the Nazca plain
may be an astronomy exam with an abundance of failed
attempts shown.
Astronomy
as the principal reason for
the lines?
Partial solar eclipse
of 29.10.184 BCE (BC).
Location: 75 ° 07 'N, 14 ° 41' S -
It lasted from 14:06 am to 16:58 am local time and
It reached maximum at 15:33 pm.
It precisely follows the path of a line.
Here are a couple of the numerous
valid examples of Nazca lines being used as
astronomical observatories
Sunset at 16.12.800 CE
(AD) (winter solstice)
Location: 75 ° 07 'N, 14 ° 41' S -
In extending the line it appears to touch the
Sun on the horizon.
No discussion of the
Nazca geoglyphs is complete without praising the
patron saint and savior of these artifacts:
Dr. Maria Reiche!
Maria Reiche
(1903-1998) was a German-born mathematician and
archaeologist who
is famous for her research and preservation of the
Nazca lines (and the
valleys surrounding the Nazca plain). Maria
Reiche was born May 15, 1903 in Dresden, Germany,
and studied mathematics, geography and languages at
the Dresden Technical University.
In 1932 she began
work as a nanny and teacher for the children of the
German consul in
Cuzco, Peru. In 1934 she
lost one of her fingers to
gangrene due to an
injury. That same year she became a teacher in
Lima and began doing
scientific translations. When World War II broke
out, she decided not to return to Germany, but
instead to remain in Peru.
In 1940 she became an
assistant of an American archaeologist
Paul Kosok who had
discovered the Nazca lines. Around 1946 she began to
map the figures in Nazca, and adjacent valleys. When
Kosok left in 1948 she continued the work and mapped
hundreds of lines and symbols in the area.
A
photo of Paul Kosok taken by Maria
Reiche (enhanced to show the
position of the sun going down on
the winter solstice exactly along
the sighting of the "solstice" line)
Reiche hypothesized
that the builders of the lines used them as a solar
calendar and an observatory for astronomical cycles.
She proved her theory (in part) by establishing that
many of the lines and geometric shapes did
correspond to specific astronomical events.
Because most of the
lines can be fully seen only from above, she
convinced the Peruvian Air Force to help her with
photographic surveys. She spent most of her time
alone in her home in town of Nasca. She explained
her theories in the book The Mystery of the
Desert and used the profits from the book to
campaign for the preservation of the desert and to
hire guards and assistants.
Maria Reiche wanted
to preserve the Nazca lines from the encroaching
traffic (in this she was unsuccessful as the Pan
American Highway now cuts right through the middle
of the pampa), and various government schemes.
She spent most of her money in the effort. She did
convince the government to restrict public access to
the area, and built an observation tower near the
highway so that visitors could see lines more
easily. She was also instrumental in having UNESCO
declare the lines a
world heritage
site in 1995.
In spite of her
deteriorated health over the years. She continued to
be a champion for this unique archaeological
treasure.
Marie Reiche died
June 8, 1998 and was buried near Nazca with official
honors. Her former home has been turned into a
museum, and the official home for ongoing Nazca
research is the "Maria Reiche Centre" in the town of
Nasca.
The Maria Reiche
Centre is open to the public and provides
information about her life and work, and the
geoglyphs themselves. The centre is now managed by
by Maria Reiche's assistant and dear friend Viktoria
Nikitzki.
Many of the Nazca drawings etched onto the Peruvian desert are so large, they can only be seen in their entirety from the air. This has led some to speculate that the Nazca
culture, who are thought to have made them, were capable of flight. This idea comes from two sources. First, paintings on pottery found in the area show images of what may have been balloons or kites. Second, wide, circular 'burn-pits' containing blackened rocks have been found at the end of many of the lines, which
may have been launch sites for hot-air balloons.
To test out this theory, an American resident of Peru, Bill Spohrer, assembled a balloon using only materials and technology that he felt would have been available to the Nazcans. Their tombs revealed a fabric with a finer weave than present-day parachute material and tighter than hot-air balloons. Using a cotton whose weave and weight was nearly identical to the Nazcan cloth samples, Spohrer and Jim Woodman, a member of the Miami-based International Explorers Society, made a hot-air balloon in the shape of an inverted triangle with a hole at the bottom to let in the heat energy from the smoke of a burn-pit. A banana-shaped gondola, woven from reeds harvested along the shores of Lake Titicaca on the Peru-Bolivia border, was stitched to the balloon.
In November 1975, with copilot Julian Nott, Woodman took to the air in the balloon, dubbed Condor 1 - after the condor figures etched onto the desert - using the heat of a 'burn-pit' for lift-off. Within seconds, they floated to about 400 feet. But after only three minutes, were brought back down again when the air in the balloon cooled. When the two men hopped out of the gondola, the lightened balloon shot up again. It went up to an altitude of 1,200 feet and sailed several kilometres before sinking back to the ground for its second and final time.
The balloon had 'flown' for 14 minutes - long enough, say the balloonists, to prove that the Nazca Indians could have taken to the sky in a hot-air balloon. However, despite their enthusiasm, there is no evidence that the Nazcans actually could have flown. The theory is fascinating speculation at best.
Clearly, many of the lines and
symbols can only be viewed in their
entirety from above.
"If the lines and symbols were designed
solely for use and observation on the ground,
they would
logically need to be clearly visible from the ground."
At ground level - lines are barely
visible.
At 10ft the Nazca lines are still
unidentifiable as shapes
At 15ft the Nazca lines are still almost
unidentifiable as shapes
At 30 feet the symbols just begin to show
their shape.
In
August 2007, a group of high energy
scientists documented their finding
of a study correlating geoglyphs and
petroglyphs, the world over, with
Aurora phenomena. Their study
suggests that artifacts, such as the
Nazca lines were an attempt to
document these phenomena.
Could some of the lines and
geometric shapes (runways, parallel
lines, and trapezoids) be for this
purpose? Could the lines be an
attempt to impose order on an
astronomical phenomena, in the hope
of pleasing their gods, or nature?
At various
locations on the Nazca plain there are "whited
out" areas the appear to be past
attempts to erase geoglyphs. In
the case above, you can see the mouth and
head of what appears to be a fish, with
most of its body erased. How many
exquisite geoglyphs have been lost?
No one knows. However, new
techniques may make it possible to
recover some of what has been lost, time
will tell.
The
path of destruction! Ancient
erasing of Nazca figures along a
direct path of a long line - why
such systematic erasure of previous
geoglyphs? Ancient political
correctness?
Note that
a part of the runway, or figures
alongside it or originally underneath it
have been erased
Anomalous
pattern field - a possible erased symbol?
But why the pattern of holes? Was
this a systematic attempt to loot?
Anomalous
pattern field - a possible erased symbol?
But why the pattern of holes? Was
this a systematic attempt to loot?
Throughout
the Nazca Plateau there are numerous
regularly shaped areas that are noticeably
brighter than the surrounding desert
pavement. These areas, in some cases,
have a geometric shape. Are these
symbols that have been obliterated?
A note about
image quality: images of lines and
symbols taken by air or from satellite
images are adjusted to improve contrast and
visibility of the artifact (line or symbol).
The results vary from image to image.
We apologize for the quality of some of the
images, but it is due to the original source
images, and the difficulty of
photographing subject object.
NazcaMystery.com
An Archaeology Site
by Tim McGuinness, Ph.D.
Maria del Mar Moreno, Sr. Editor; Kyra McGuinness,
Research Staff The
information presented is believed to be correct and accurate.
However,
please let us know of any errors.
This is a scholarly work for non-profit educational purposes.
Some content used under "Fair Use"
provision of section 107 U.S. Copyright Law.
Some content from third-parties.
All third-party copyrights acknowledged.
Sources credited where possible or known. If an item is
missing its source please let us know and we will correct it.
Our Websites are dedicated
to:
Kyra, Mar, Suzie, Maia, Mikeala, Jenaya, Michael, and the whole
McFamily!
Past, Present, and Future - Here, There, and Everywhere! And to
friends in Spain, Peru, Costa Rica, and a Land Down Under - You know who you are!
Please send any
comments to:
nazca2007 @ mcguinnesspublishing
. c o m
We Recommend The World's #1 Hosting Company!
For everywhere in the world!